<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still not open…  Kindling without fire…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nicholasnapp.com/2008/11/21/still-not-open%e2%80%a6-kindling-without-fire%e2%80%a6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nicholasnapp.com/2008/11/21/still-not-open%e2%80%a6-kindling-without-fire%e2%80%a6/</link>
	<description>Life, the Entrepreneurship &#38; Everything...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://blog.nicholasnapp.com/2008/11/21/still-not-open%e2%80%a6-kindling-without-fire%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-1965</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nicholasnapp.com/?p=218#comment-1965</guid>
		<description>Great point on the last two posts about the disconnect between the ideals of &quot;openness&quot; and the reality of the the power of closed.  In a market or industry where carriers and vendors create a closed system for service, devices and applications, a closed system is the only way to create a powerful, seamless experience.

In the US, application developers and mobile websites have tried for year to promote &quot;off-deck&quot; applications, but have been blocked by the carriers&#039; refusal to open up access, citing the need to &quot;guarantee a consistent experience&quot; under the guise of controlling access and additional data revenues.  Apple and Google are each just beginning to pry open the wireless industry their own ways: Apple most notably by changing the relationship between carriers and device manufacturers, and Google most notably by pushing open access and lowering the barriers for device verification.  It&#039;s not just about the App Stores...

DoCoMo, of course, created an open access and distribution model for mobile applications and data services over iMode years ago (nearly a decade?), and deployed a standard payment model that made sense for consumers and independent developers, and we can see the results today: Japan is way ahead in mobile services.  It&#039;s not just about culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point on the last two posts about the disconnect between the ideals of &#8220;openness&#8221; and the reality of the the power of closed.  In a market or industry where carriers and vendors create a closed system for service, devices and applications, a closed system is the only way to create a powerful, seamless experience.</p>
<p>In the US, application developers and mobile websites have tried for year to promote &#8220;off-deck&#8221; applications, but have been blocked by the carriers&#8217; refusal to open up access, citing the need to &#8220;guarantee a consistent experience&#8221; under the guise of controlling access and additional data revenues.  Apple and Google are each just beginning to pry open the wireless industry their own ways: Apple most notably by changing the relationship between carriers and device manufacturers, and Google most notably by pushing open access and lowering the barriers for device verification.  It&#8217;s not just about the App Stores&#8230;</p>
<p>DoCoMo, of course, created an open access and distribution model for mobile applications and data services over iMode years ago (nearly a decade?), and deployed a standard payment model that made sense for consumers and independent developers, and we can see the results today: Japan is way ahead in mobile services.  It&#8217;s not just about culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

